A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to create their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their site, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, which can be partly designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action being an try to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-high h2o through a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances, a picture which has considering that grow to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been meant to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how The 2 men entered the drinking water during significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions were being cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
On the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into secured land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and situations attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting as an alternative that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a pair only looking to build a loved ones dwelling in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all operates are performed according to Specialist information and authorized programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into The ocean through a storm, never alter the fundamental info.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute around development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your problem that lots of observers see as progressively widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now a lot more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier noted the businessman had Beforehand been associated with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline along with the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as crafted complies with setting up permission and whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning conditions. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other long once the authorized fees have already been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation prolong over and above that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute René Collier serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential troubles such as environmental protection and assets rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre on the dispute stands partly created, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful inquiries. Whether it is going to ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s results. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched setting up disputes in north Dublin lately.